Re: [regrep] ebXML Registry: Deviations from CCTS

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

David RR Webber wrote:

>...Furthermore we are looking within the new Registry
>SCM work to define what the semantic content 
>is in an XML instance in the Registry that will
>work for those ContentReferences...
>
David:

You should be aware that it will not necessarily be an XML registry 
instance (as was explained ot me).  CCRIM decided before I joined that 
CC's will be held as a RIM instances.  It is unclear how that will be 
serialized into XML.  I am assuming that the RSS will be expanded to 
meet those requirements of getting an XML instance back as a return to a 
query.  Since CAM requires this, you are probably a great person to 
assemble the requirements for such.

>I do not see any reason to modify the CCTS 
>specification at this point, nor the RIM binding.
>
[DN] Joseph has identified some definiciencies.  We have to discuss the 
impact of those and decide how to handle them in order to get the *CC's 
and any *BIE's into a registry system.  I would not rule out small 
changes to either at this point.

A face to face meeting would be useful for this.  Maybe we can set 
something up in DC?

Duane

-- 
Senior Standards Strategist
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://www.adobe.com