Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: Methodology

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

<Quote>
Doing one without the other (eg. - defining the storage without the 
serialization) won't get us any further ahead than we are now and there 
are dependencies between the two.
</Quote>

We can certainly do both, which would enable us to retain the work we've
done so far on the storage. Thoughts?

Joe

Duane Nickull wrote:
> 
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> >Duane,
> >
> >... the SC
> >debated this topic vigorously back in June 2003, and after a very
> >intense and detailed debate decided that while the creation of an XML
> >serialization for Core Components is a very important factor, it was out
> >of scope of our charter and should be done by another group.
> >
> [DN] I would like to propose that we add this to this groups' charter.
>  Doing one without the other (eg. - defining the storage without the
> serialization) won't get us any further ahead than we are now and there
> are dependencies between the two.  It has to be done and it has been
> passed from group to group for 4 years now.  Someone has to do this.
>  The work has been done several times over.
> 
> Let's do this now.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Duane Nickull
> 
> --
> Senior Standards Strategist
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://www.adobe.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php.