Re: [regrep-cc-review] Re: Methodology - OWL

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Thanks so much Duane. In terms of the SC, we still have not received any
feedback indicating any agreement whatsoever that we should include
serialization in our work. If anyone feels that we should, please
express this on our listserv. Unless there are responses, we can't have
a sense of what the SC believes is the best course of action.

We also have not yet clarified whether or not the serialization would be
in place of the storage work we have done so far, or in addition to.
Let's also please clarify this point as well.

Looking forward to your responses...

Joe

Duane Nickull wrote:
> 
> All:
> 
> I would propose that we use a RUP/UMM type methodological approach to
> our work in this area.
> 
> 1. gather stakeholder requirements, technical requirements of what is
> needed in the Serialization.
> 
> 2. define the serialization first.
> 
> 3. work backwards based on the serialization to determine what must be
> present in the storage format.  IMO - the serialization requirements
> will create dependencies on the storage format.
> 
> To me,  this is the correct and logical way to approach the problem.  I
> hereby volunteer to take a stab at the first draft of #1 above
> (requirements for the serialization).
> 
> Duane Nickull
> 
> --
> Senior Standards Strategist
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://www.adobe.com
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php.