OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep-cc-review message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] CC Serialization andUBL-CoreComponentParameters.xsd


Thanks for writing in.  I see that Mark has already commented on the UBL 

The requirements document is capturing all the CCTS requirements and 
adding them.  Things like UUID, dictionary name etc will be supported as 
requirements.  There are other aspects of the ebXML RIM that also have 
to be accounted for.

 Support for this data model is imperative.  The more I work with this 
stuff, the greater appreciation I have for the CCTS team.  The stuff 
they have dealt with is fairly monumental and complex in nature.

The specifics for the model are not the main problem.  The more pressing 
needs are to capture this in a format that will be useable today and 
forwards compatible with any changes, support the data models, not 
prevent any specific syntax binding, be flexible and acceptable to the 
CCTS team.


Antti Jokipii wrote:

>In UBL, "documentation" of data elements is defined in CoreComponentParameters (and used as a documentation of generated XML schema elements).
><ccts:Component xmlns:ccts="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CoreComponentParameters:1:0-beta">
>  <ccts:CategoryCode>BBIE</ccts:CategoryCode>
>  <ccts:DictionaryEntryName>Contact. Telephone. Text</ccts:DictionaryEntryName>
>  <ccts:Definition>The number or virtual address of a telephone in a telecommunication system </ccts:Definition>
>  <ccts:ObjectClass>Contact</ccts:ObjectClass>
>  <ccts:PropertyTerm>Telephone</ccts:PropertyTerm>
>  <ccts:RepresentationTerm>Text</ccts:RepresentationTerm>
>  <ccts:DataType>Text.Type</ccts:DataType>
>I think that Data Element Metadata(DEM) should include all information that is in UBL CoreComponentParameters... 
>Also CC serialization format could be based on CoreComponentParameters if we add there parts that are missing (like UUID, version information, etc).
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com]
>Sent: 1. huhtikuuta 2004 0:14
>To: Antti Jokipii
>Cc: regrep-cc-review@lists.oasis-open.org;
>Subject: Re: [regrep-cc-review] CC Serialization and
>Is it possible for you to make a presentation to the registry group on 
>what aspects you suggest we review?  There is a lot of information there 
>and it would be more efficient to have this done by phone.  I can ask 
>Kathryn to put this on the agenda.
>Antti Jokipii wrote:
>>I think that UBL CoreComponentParameters should be reviewed...
>>Beta: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ubl/lcsc/UBLv1-beta/xsd/common/UBL-CoreComponentParameters-1.0-beta.xsd
>>Antti Jokipii
>>Chief Technology Advisor
>>Republica Corp., R & D Labs
>>Ohjelmakaari 1, 40500 Jyväskylä, Finland
>>E-Mail Antti.Jokipii@republica.fi
>>GSM  +358 41 57 186 99
>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-cc-review/members/leave_workgroup.php.

Senior Standards Strategist
Adobe Systems, Inc.

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]