RE: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002

["Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>]

And I based my opinion upon the same criteria so that is why I ask to
discuss this on Monday.  

<snip>
	What I want to focus on right now is comments 
	that are specific to version 2.0 of the specs.
</snip>

Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Munter, Joel D
Cc: 'Oasis RR Comment Resolution'
Subject: Re: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002


Joel,

I did not make this decision unilaterally. It was based on Katheryn's email
at:

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200203/msg00030.html

I applied the criterea she had laid out.

--
Regards,
Farrukh


"Munter, Joel D" wrote:

> Farrukh,
>
> I ask you to please place this as a discussion item on the agenda.  This
is
> not your sole decision to make.  This is why we have the resolution
> sub-team.  The fact is that Kathryn discussed this in several team Reg/Rep
> meetings and the comments themselves from Nita indicate specific things in
> the V2 Reg/Rep that DO NOT meet their requirements.  In my mind, that
would
> make this a valid V2 comment.
>
> <snip>
>         We(the ebXML BP Catalog team) had a long conversation last
>         week with Kathryn about unique identification and what their
>         scheme should be. We provided her with our requirements for
>         unique identification that was not satisfied by the current
>         UUID specification of regrep. The various things that we
>         touched base upon were:...
> </snip>
>
> I agree that this may in fact become a V3 work item but I strongly
recommend
> that please record the comment and the agreed disposition.  I at least ask
> that we discuss this in our sub-team.
>
> Thanks,
> Joel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:42 AM
> To: 'Oasis RR Comment Resolution'
> Subject: Re: [regrep-comresolve] Issue database distribution: 3/15/2002
>
> I should have noted that I did not include Nita's comments at:
>
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200202/msg00014.html
>
> because:
>
> -They were not directed to V2 specs
>
> -They were part of ongoing discussions between Registry TC and other TCs
> focused on what we need to do for V3.
>
> Please bring to the team's attention any other issues that I might have
> missed. Thanks.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>