OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep-raws message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Subject: RE: ROWS Proposal: please send your recommendation by email


I think Joel, as our liaison to UDDI, is the "sub-group" that you referred
to in your last paragraph.

Regards,  Dan

Metadata Management Technology and Standard
IBM DBTI for e-Business
Notes:     Dan Chang/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS
Internet:  dtchang@us.ibm.com
VM:          IBMUSM50(DTCHANG)
Phone:    (408)-463-2319

                    Krishna Sankar                                                                     
                    <ksankar@cisco       To:     Dan Chang/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, "'Farrukh Najmi'"   
                    .com>                 <Farrukh.Najmi@sun.com>                                      
                                         cc:     Scott Hinkelman/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, "Munter, Joel D"    
                    09/26/01 02:58        <joel.d.munter@intel.com>, "'Lisa Carnahan'"                 
                    PM                    <lisa.carnahan@nist.gov>, Tom Glover/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA,      
                                         Subject:     RE: ROWS Proposal: please send your              
                                          recommendation by email                                      

Hi all,

           I have a couple of non-pc observations:

  |   Let's address any perceived deficiencies in UDDI first before we
attempt to
  |   change aspects of the Oasis Registry candidate specifications to
up to
  |   the capabilities" that already  exist in UDDI.  We have several ways
  |   requesting changes to the UDDI specifications, 1) through UDDI-WG
  |   contributions; 2) through UDDI-AG member contributions 3) through
  |   lists; and 4) through the UDDI liaison role.
           This OASIS TC not a UDDI TC. Last time I checked, I didn't see
the charter
as "address perceived deficiencies in UDDI". That is work of the UDDI
groups. IMHO, this TC, shouldn't be wasting cycles influencing UDDI, as a
group. I am sure individual members who are in both forums (including
myself) are doing that, anyway .

           Second, one should look at a feature as to whether it makes
sense for an
OASIS Registry. One should not add features because UDDI has it or refrain
from adding a feature because UDDI has that feature. The comparison is
irrelevant. I do not see duplication of features as a cause for concern.

           We should have a vision for the OASIS registry and should add
according to that vision.

           Another point re the feature set is Scott's view of "without
signs of industry traction." IMHO, this is irrelevant as well. If a feature
makes sense, include it. None of us have a clear crystal ball to predict
future :o( and adoptability and adaptability.

           I thought there is a sub-group which was going to *position* and
rationalize OASIS registry with UDDI. What is the recommendation of that
group ? Possibly this sub-group could shape the OASIS Registry vision.


To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]

Powered by eList eXpress LLC