OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
regrep-semantic
141 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic ebXML Registry Proposal: The TwoBindings Solution
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 29 Feb 2004 23:07:19 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic ebXML Registry Proposal: The TwoBindings Solution
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 29 Feb 2004 17:51:21 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic ebXML Registry Proposal: The Two Bindings Solution
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 29 Feb 2004 15:42:45 -0000
Semantic ebXML Registry Proposal: The Two Bindings Solution
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 28 Feb 2004 22:47:23 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Potential Presentation on March 24th
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 27 Feb 2004 15:49:03 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Potential Presentation on March 24th
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 27 Feb 2004 15:46:03 -0000
Potential Presentation on March 24th
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 27 Feb 2004 15:09:10 -0000
SCORM and CORDA
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 26 Feb 2004 22:12:21 -0000
Ixiasoft and ebXML Registry?
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 26 Feb 2004 22:09:04 -0000
[Fwd: [DC-XMLUsers] TopQuadrant Semantic Technology Seminars andWorkshops - March 22-25]
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 26 Feb 2004 19:20:35 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - meeting_minutes_2-24-2004.html uploaded
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 25 Feb 2004 22:06:22 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Groups - meeting_minutes_2-24-2004.html uploaded
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 25 Feb 2004 01:17:33 -0000
Groups - meeting_minutes_2-24-2004.html uploaded
From
Farrukh.najmi@sun.com on 24 Feb 2004 21:30:52 -0000
Electric utility ontology
From
"John Gillerman" <john.gillerman@sisconet.com> on 24 Feb 2004 20:15:56 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - Workgroup Meeting modified
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 24 Feb 2004 17:52:15 -0000
[regrep-semantic] New Action Item #0003 Issue: Can the RIM support ontologies without change?
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 24 Feb 2004 17:48:45 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0002 Issue: Classes are not the only type of ontology element
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 24 Feb 2004 17:33:10 -0000
[regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0002 Issue: Classes are not the only type of ontology element
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 24 Feb 2004 16:52:38 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we needto choose Ontology representation
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 24 Feb 2004 16:40:24 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0001 Issue: Should weinclude context in ontology element relationships
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 24 Feb 2004 16:01:52 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we need to choose Ontology representation
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 24 Feb 2004 15:38:32 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0001 Issue: Should weinclude context in ontology element relationships
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 24 Feb 2004 15:18:37 -0000
[regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0001 Issue: Should we include context in ontology element relationships
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 24 Feb 2004 15:14:18 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we needto choose Ontology representation
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 24 Feb 2004 15:06:08 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we need to choose Ontology representation
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 24 Feb 2004 15:05:42 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we need to choose Ontology representation
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 24 Feb 2004 14:53:07 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we need to choose Ontology representation
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 24 Feb 2004 14:29:12 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we needto choose Ontology representation
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 24 Feb 2004 13:25:56 -0000
Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we need to choose Ontology representation
From
Farrukh.najmi@sun.com on 24 Feb 2004 13:13:32 -0000
Groups - Workgroup Meeting modified
From
Farrukh.najmi@sun.com on 24 Feb 2004 12:12:55 -0000
Groups - UseCasesandScenarios.html uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 23 Feb 2004 22:51:02 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Groups - DataCenterindscenario.htm uploaded
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 23 Feb 2004 22:41:31 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] FW: [semanticweb] UDDI and semantics
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 23 Feb 2004 22:41:22 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Groups - DataCenterindscenario.htm uploaded
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 23 Feb 2004 22:14:51 -0000
Groups - UseCasesandScenarios.html uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 23 Feb 2004 19:47:10 -0000
Groups - DataCenterindscenario.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 23 Feb 2004 19:35:59 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] FW: [semanticweb] UDDI and semantics
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 23 Feb 2004 19:11:45 -0000
FW: [semanticweb] UDDI and semantics
From
"Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com> on 23 Feb 2004 17:48:37 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] MetaMatrix and ebXML Registry
From
"Jeffrey T. Pollock" <jeff.pollock@networkinference.com> on 22 Feb 2004 19:09:28 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] MetaMatrix and ebXML Registry
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 22 Feb 2004 18:30:01 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] MetaMatrix and ebXML Registry
From
"John Gillerman" <john.gillerman@sisconet.com> on 22 Feb 2004 18:19:00 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: FYI moving off Kavi [regrep-semantic, Use cases and scenarios are being moved]
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 20 Feb 2004 18:52:52 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: FYI moving off Kavi [regrep-semantic,Use cases and scenarios are being moved]
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 20 Feb 2004 17:15:03 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: FYI moving off Kavi [regrep-semantic, Usecases and scenarios are being moved]
From
"Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org> on 20 Feb 2004 15:20:17 -0000
Groups - useCasesAndScenarios.html modified
From
karl.best@oasis-open.org on 20 Feb 2004 15:18:19 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: FYI moving off Kavi [regrep-semantic, Use cases and scenarios are being moved]
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 20 Feb 2004 04:47:34 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: FYI moving off Kavi [regrep-semantic,Use cases and scenarios are being moved]
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2004 21:21:07 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] MetaMatrix and ebXML Registry
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 19 Feb 2004 20:29:44 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] MetaMatrix and ebXML Registry
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 19 Feb 2004 20:14:24 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: FYI moving off Kavi [regrep-semantic, Usecases and scenarios are being moved]
From
"Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org> on 19 Feb 2004 19:20:54 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: FYI moving off Kavi [regrep-semantic,Use cases and scenarios are being moved]
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2004 18:51:50 -0000
MetaMatrix and ebXML Registry
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 19 Feb 2004 18:25:38 -0000
Re: FYI moving off Kavi [regrep-semantic, Use cases and scenariosare being moved]
From
"Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org> on 19 Feb 2004 18:25:14 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 19 Feb 2004 17:39:13 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 19 Feb 2004 17:37:23 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 19 Feb 2004 17:35:44 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2004 17:33:24 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 19 Feb 2004 17:31:35 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2004 17:26:25 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 19 Feb 2004 17:23:11 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 19 Feb 2004 17:08:54 -0000
Need host for next week's con-call
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2004 16:08:49 -0000
Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2004 16:05:04 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 17 Feb 2004 16:59:55 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 17 Feb 2004 16:58:58 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 17 Feb 2004 16:43:55 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 17 Feb 2004 16:42:29 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 17 Feb 2004 16:30:03 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 17 Feb 2004 14:41:31 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 17 Feb 2004 11:45:43 -0000
Semantic searching use case / challenge
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 17 Feb 2004 01:40:56 -0000
No special meeting on Tue Feb 17
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 16 Feb 2004 23:03:01 -0000
[Fwd: International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004) Call For Papers]
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 16 Feb 2004 14:24:06 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 13 Feb 2004 22:28:20 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 13 Feb 2004 22:22:10 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 13 Feb 2004 22:04:56 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 13 Feb 2004 18:42:51 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 13 Feb 2004 17:00:41 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"Jeff Pollock" <jeff.pollock@networkinference.com> on 13 Feb 2004 06:54:56 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 13 Feb 2004 01:59:43 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 12 Feb 2004 19:43:19 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 12 Feb 2004 19:34:41 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"Jeff Pollock" <jeff.pollock@networkinference.com> on 12 Feb 2004 17:06:07 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"John Gillerman" <john.gillerman@sisconet.com> on 12 Feb 2004 16:31:26 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 12 Feb 2004 16:22:57 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 12 Feb 2004 15:13:43 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"John Gillerman" <john.gillerman@sisconet.com> on 12 Feb 2004 15:07:43 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"John Gillerman" <john.gillerman@sisconet.com> on 12 Feb 2004 14:49:05 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 12 Feb 2004 14:49:02 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 12 Feb 2004 14:42:35 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 12 Feb 2004 14:22:40 -0000
[Fwd: CFP: ECAI 2004 Workshop on Application of Semantic Web Technologies to Web Communities]
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 12 Feb 2004 14:08:41 -0000
Groups - usecasesall.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 10 Feb 2004 23:08:57 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 10 Feb 2004 22:30:53 -0000
OWL and RDF became W3C Recommendations today
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 10 Feb 2004 22:29:05 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] titles on use cases
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 10 Feb 2004 22:08:11 -0000
[Fwd: FW: [sem-grd] RDF and OWL are W3C Recommendations]
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 10 Feb 2004 19:39:26 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] common terms for SCM and questions on DW scenarios
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 10 Feb 2004 17:35:14 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 10 Feb 2004 17:34:32 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 10 Feb 2004 17:20:37 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 10 Feb 2004 17:05:24 -0000
common terms for SCM and questions on DW scenarios
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 10 Feb 2004 16:54:53 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 10 Feb 2004 16:37:17 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 10 Feb 2004 16:29:40 -0000
titles on use cases
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 10 Feb 2004 16:22:32 -0000
re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 10 Feb 2004 16:12:56 -0000
[Ontology Sharing][Fwd: Sharing]
From
"Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> on 10 Feb 2004 14:28:29 -0000
Groups - usecasesLattice.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 10 Feb 2004 13:26:03 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usenariosBanking.htm uploaded
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 9 Feb 2004 16:31:27 -0000
Groups - usecasesNouns.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 16:31:02 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Groups - Workgroup Meeting modified
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 9 Feb 2004 16:22:23 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] Groups - usenariosBanking.htm uploaded
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 9 Feb 2004 16:22:10 -0000
Groups - usecasesDict.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 16:06:35 -0000
Groups - usecasesCollb.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 16:03:22 -0000
Groups - usecasesExtend.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:59:56 -0000
Groups - usecasesDiscover.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:58:03 -0000
Groups - usecasesClssfy.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:56:38 -0000
Groups - usecasesRegO.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:50:05 -0000
Groups - usenariosAirTransport.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:48:28 -0000
Groups - usenariosBanking.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:44:57 -0000
Groups - usecases.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:44:52 -0000
Groups - usenarios.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:18:26 -0000
Groups - Workgroup Meeting modified
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 9 Feb 2004 15:03:19 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 8 Feb 2004 18:16:20 -0000
Auto Industry: TREAD ACT Compliance Scenario
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 8 Feb 2004 15:27:40 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 7 Feb 2004 22:12:58 -0000
RE: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
"John Gillerman" <john.gillerman@sisconet.com> on 6 Feb 2004 23:12:29 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 6 Feb 2004 22:47:58 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] re: Will a Universal Data Element Framework [UDEF] Class of Applications fit within the ebXML Semantic Registry ?
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 6 Feb 2004 20:25:32 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Fri Feb 06 14:58:26 2004
Re: [regrep-semantic] re: Will a Universal Data Element Framework [UDEF] Class of Applications fit within the ebXML Semantic Registry ?
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 6 Feb 2004 19:57:42 -0000
RE: RIM Associations and Classifications [was: Will a Universal Data Element Framework [UDEF] Class of Applications fit within the ebXML Semantic Registry ?]
From
Nikola Stojanovic <Nikola.Stojanovic@RosettaNet.org> on 6 Feb 2004 19:56:10 -0000
re: Will a Universal Data Element Framework [UDEF] Class of Applications fit within the ebXML Semantic Registry ?
From
ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 6 Feb 2004 19:30:01 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: SCM - A liaison Affair
From
Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> on 5 Feb 2004 21:15:24 -0000
Re: SCM - A liaison Affair
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 5 Feb 2004 17:10:47 -0000
Groups - Using Registry & OWL Research Objectives : ProjectsProf. Asuman Dogac added
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 5 Feb 2004 15:20:32 -0000
SCM - A liaison Affair
From
"Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com> on 3 Feb 2004 00:06:46 -0000
Groups - meeting_minutes.htm uploaded
From
carlmattocks@checkmi.com on 2 Feb 2004 16:10:40 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Will a Universal Data Element Framework [UDEF] Class of Applications fit within the ebXML Semantic Registry ?
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 1 Feb 2004 21:08:07 -0000
Re: [regrep-semantic] Will a Universal Data Element Framework [UDEF]Class of Applications fit within the ebXML Semantic Registry ?
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 1 Feb 2004 20:50:28 -0000
Will a Universal Data Element Framework [UDEF] Class of Applications fit within the ebXML Semantic Registry ?
From
"Zachary Alexander" <zack2003@ebtdesign.com> on 1 Feb 2004 18:31:39 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2