Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]

[Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote:

>Carl Mattocks [mailto:carlmattocks@checkmi.com] wrote
>
>  
>
>>Ok - If UDEF is a fine example of an applied 'Naming Convention' would it
>>be possible to identify  'class words'  and / or 'GUID-like patterns' and
>>map them to a (manufacturing ? ) ontology and create a lattice structure ?
>>
>>If so  -does this address Zach's orginal question ?
>>    
>>
>
>For new SC members, let's repeat Zach's question along with Carl's subsequent
>elaboration on one of the terms used within the question:
>
>Zachary Alexander wrote:
>  
>
>>Will a UDEF (Universal Data Element Framework) Class of application fit
>>within the ebXML Semantic Registry model? How would a Semantic Aware
>>ebXML Registry support UDEF? The UDEF is an international,
>>cross-industry standards effort that is developing Object and Property
>>word trees that can be combined to construct semantic identifiers.
>>
>>[1] http://www.udef.org
>>    
>>
>
>Carl wrote:
>  
>
>>I will use 'UDEF capable application  and /or UDEF class of application'
>>to describe a set of artifacts that should be categorized by an Ontology
>>Class representing UDEF facets.
>>    
>>
>
>-Evan
>
>
>
>
>  
>
I do not recall there being a Semantic Interop use case defined yet. 
Does it make sense to cast the UDEF discussion
into the context of a new Semantic Interop use case? If this makes sense 
would Zach be able to submit one? Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh