[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: >Carl Mattocks [mailto:carlmattocks@checkmi.com] wrote > > > >>Ok - If UDEF is a fine example of an applied 'Naming Convention' would it >>be possible to identify 'class words' and / or 'GUID-like patterns' and >>map them to a (manufacturing ? ) ontology and create a lattice structure ? >> >>If so -does this address Zach's orginal question ? >> >> > >For new SC members, let's repeat Zach's question along with Carl's subsequent >elaboration on one of the terms used within the question: > >Zachary Alexander wrote: > > >>Will a UDEF (Universal Data Element Framework) Class of application fit >>within the ebXML Semantic Registry model? How would a Semantic Aware >>ebXML Registry support UDEF? The UDEF is an international, >>cross-industry standards effort that is developing Object and Property >>word trees that can be combined to construct semantic identifiers. >> >>[1] http://www.udef.org >> >> > >Carl wrote: > > >>I will use 'UDEF capable application and /or UDEF class of application' >>to describe a set of artifacts that should be categorized by an Ontology >>Class representing UDEF facets. >> >> > >-Evan > > > > > > I do not recall there being a Semantic Interop use case defined yet. Does it make sense to cast the UDEF discussion into the context of a new Semantic Interop use case? If this makes sense would Zach be able to submit one? Thanks. -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]