[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] [UDEF]
ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: >>I do not recall there being a Semantic Interop use case defined yet. >>Does it make sense to cast the UDEF discussion >>into the context of a new Semantic Interop use case? If this makes sense >>would Zach be able to submit one? Thanks. >> >> > >I thought that the Lattice use case [#9] was meant to fill that role.? >See Example (2) within [#9]. > >-Evan > >[#9] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep-semantic/download.php/5390/usecasesLattice.htm > > Duh... I need to catch up. Its been a hellishly busy week. Thanks Evan. BTW it is fortunate that as long as we support Ontology classes to be published in registry Association between them will be a free-bee (as in already supported). Nice. -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]