[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge
Farrukh, I thought you answered my question OK the first time around - I just wanted to make sure that we had support in for linking topics and items into related groups - that seems something OWL brings to the table - so you get that Thesaurus like behaviour - "see related items" - obviously vivisomo is exposing that more directly in the result tree as groups. The question is more like - could you support the vivisomo UI and feature set with an ebXML registry as the backend - I believe the answer is Yes. As Duane pointed out however - you still need an engine and query management system to drive that and be the brains in the middle. Thanks, DW. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> To: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM> Cc: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>; "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>; <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 11:55 AM Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Semantic searching use case / challenge > It's also about on-the-fly classifications of results. > > Joe > > Farrukh Najmi wrote: > > > > Duane Nickull wrote: > > > > > IMO - I would not require this to be a feature since this is concerned > > > with graphical representation and forcing vendors is wrong. > > > > > > The functionality can be delivered by a contextual search capability > > > combined with secondary efficiency mechanism. When we designed GoXML, > > > we kicked around the idea of caching the most commonly requested > > > searches so the results did not have to be generated at run time. > > > Many existing SE vendors also employ algorithms to determine which > > > results are clicked on the most and that raises their relevancy score. > > > If we design the search component to provide meaningful results, > > > vendors can freely offer clustered search results, pre cached results > > > and employ secondary mechanisms to present the searches that they deem > > > fit. > > > > > > I did like what you showed me, just not sure we should make it a > > > mandatory part of the spec. > > > > > > Duane > > > > My bad. On re-reading vivisimo I realize this what not just federated > > queries but display of query results graphically. No we do not do that > > today in ebXML Registry specs and I agree with Duane that we should not > > make that a spec feature. > > > > > > > > > > > David RR Webber wrote: > > > > > >> Search result clustering: www.vivisimo.com > > >> > > >> Can we foresee an ebXML registry supporting this? > > >> > > >> DW > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Farrukh >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]