Re: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

I definitely understand and appreciate Zach's very valid concerns - but
I think that given the work that we are doing here, we have a "special
case". Our work is so connected to the other external efforts taking
place, that it would be almost potentially "damaging" to our effort to
operate in a "vacuum" (using term loosely). Additionally, we don't want
to miss out on highly valuable opportunities for our work to influence
these other efforts. Stovepipes here can be very detrimental.

Joe 

Zachary Alexander wrote:
> 
> Farrukh,
> 
> Does this mean the ebXML Registry SCM standard will no longer be an
> OASIS standard? Shouldn't this be put to a vote to the Reg/Rep TC? Isn't
> this the same as saying that anyone can participate in the development
> of the OASIS Registry SCM standard regardless of membership in OASIS?
> 
> Zachary Alexander
> The IT Investment Architect
> ebTDesign LLC, (703) 283-4325
> http://www.ebTDesign.com | http://www.p2pspeaker.com
> http://www.p2peconomy.com | http://www.itinvestmentvehicle.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 11:17 AM
> To: regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [regrep-semantic] Use cases and scenarios are bing moved
> 
> Team,
> 
> We are moving the use case and scenario documents from KAVI to an
> external web site for the following reasons:
> 
> -We need to share use cases with Semantic Web community at large outside
> 
> OASIS to get broad feedback.
> KAVI does not seem to allow that.
> 
> -We need the URLs to our document tree to be user-defined (us). Notice
> how much more memorable they
> are in the new location.
> 
> The new location for the use cases and scenarios documents is:
> 
> http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/ebxmlrr-spec/scmsc/useCases
> 
> The content is identical to what was last in KAVI except that I have
> changed the names of some files.
> 
> You may soon see messages about deletion of KAVI version of these files.
> 
> Just ignore them.
> 
> Recall that in our last meeting we had covered user cases 3, 4 and 5.
> 
> For our next meeting on Tues 2/24 at 1PM I propose we resume with
> discussion of use cases in the following order:
> 
> 5-9, 1, 2
> 
> Until then please study the use cases and share comments. Also feel free
> 
> to submit new use cases and scenarios using the template established for
> 
> the group. Thank you.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh