Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we need to choose Ontology representation

[ewallace@cme.nist.gov]

Farrukh:

You wrote:

>Number: #0000
>Description: Issue: Do we need to choose Ontology representation
>Owner: Farrukh Najmi (Farrukh.najmi@sun.com)
>
>
>Comments:
>Farrukh Najmi  2004-02-24 13:35 GMT
>Should ebXML Registry define a specific ontology representation format
>(e.g. OWL) or should it define a more abstract model that allows for
>multiple Ontology formats to be supported.

Please, instead of "define a specific ontology representation format" let's
say "select a specific ontology representation format".  We certainly 
should not be inventing a new one, and I don't think you mean that we
should.

BTW - should we use the above format for posting future issues, or is
there a tool we should be using for submitting them?

-Evan