[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Groups - New Action Item #0000 Issue: Do we needto choose Ontology representation
ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: >Farrukh: > >You wrote: > > > >>Number: #0000 >>Description: Issue: Do we need to choose Ontology representation >>Owner: Farrukh Najmi (Farrukh.najmi@sun.com) >> >> >>Comments: >>Farrukh Najmi 2004-02-24 13:35 GMT >>Should ebXML Registry define a specific ontology representation format >>(e.g. OWL) or should it define a more abstract model that allows for >>multiple Ontology formats to be supported. >> >> > >Please, instead of "define a specific ontology representation format" let's >say "select a specific ontology representation format". We certainly >should not be inventing a new one, and I don't think you mean that we >should. > > +1 We certainly do not want to define an ontology representation format :-) Will change. >BTW - should we use the above format for posting future issues, or is >there a tool we should be using for submitting them? > >-Evan > > > That is the problem. I am amazed but KAVI does not seem to have an Issue Management feature. That is why I am proposing we abuse the Action Item feature to manage issues. Will bring up with OASIS folks in separate thread. Lets discuss this more in SC meeting today. -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]