Re: [regrep-semantic] Ontology Assembly in Scope?

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Farrukh,

Except that you need three implementations to make it real ; -)

And - you need something to allow you to rapidly prototype
some examples and see how well it works against real
examples.

I'm not suggesting you mandate VS as the only way
of doing this of course.

DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
To: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>
Cc: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>; <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 6:59 AM
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Ontology Assembly in Scope?


> David RR Webber wrote:
>
> >Joe,
> >
> >This seems something we can definately prototype in
> >VisualScript - and then create XML output from
> >the models for inserting into registry.
> >
> >Having a visual model of the relationships between
> >classes and ontologies is obviously something
> >registry cannot be expected to do directly - it
> >can just hold the XML that represents those - and
> >then obviously it needs client side tools such as
> >VisualScript to make it "real" for the user.
> >
> >Thanks, DW
> >
> >
> Visual script being a product and SCM SC being a standards body
> I would say Visual SCript is definitely out of scope for works of SCM SC.
>
> The question being asked is whether our proposed specs will address
> Ontology Assembly not what products or tols could be used for Ontology
> Assembly.
>
> >----- Original Message ----- 
> >From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
> >To: <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org>
> >Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 10:21 AM
> >Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Ontology Assembly in Scope?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>Joe asked:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Please pardon this question if it is already covered in a use case (I'm
> >>>behind on reading): Does/will this SC's charter include the automated
> >>>assembly of ontologies from registered classes?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I do not believe that any of the current use cases address infering
> >>ontologies from registered classes (the chairs should answer the charter
> >>bit of this question).  If you would like to have this feature, why not
> >>suggest it as another use case?
> >>
> >>-Evan
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
>
>
>