[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] PR5: Individual as a new canonical objectType
David RR Webber wrote: >I would like to see more granularity here - are you just thinking >about Name, Role, ID - or is there more to this? > > Are you confusing this with an individual human? Individual is meant to represnet an instance of a Class. I believe teh name is very misleading. I would prefer to call it Instance instead of Individual. Thoughts? +1 on all of Evans new PRs. >If more - then right now we have basic individual information >(see http://registry.oasis-open.org ), or we potentially have >way more information - aka the OASIS CIQ model. > >Just trying to find out how long the piece of string is here... > >Thanks, DW. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov> >To: <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org> >Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:47 PM >Subject: [regrep-semantic] PR5: Individual as a new canonical objectType > > > > >>PR5. Need objectType to represent a Individual >> >> We need a new canonical objectType within the canonical >> ObjectTypeScheme to represent objects of type Individual (instance). >> >> Motivation: Must be able to identify an Individual (which is a >> member of an Ontology Class) within RIM in a standard interoperable >> manner. >> >> >> >> -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]