[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Government Computer News (GCN) Interview -Mentioned Our Work
Excellent - then we can work on including that Namespace Manager Function that I proposed to the Registry TC in January 2002[1]. [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200201/msg00061.html Joe (couldn't resist throwing that in, as namespace identifiers were predicatably and conspicuously absent in your response:) David RR Webber wrote: > > Joe, > > Good points. The SCM noun use case definately handles the > details via a TN to support elements/attributes/datatypes > storage. > > I'm planning to have a draft of that fo mid-May timeframe. > Right now we have just a strawman XSD - but no documentation > to go with it - and of course the use case too. > > Thanks, DW. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> > To: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> > Cc: "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>; "SCM" > <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 9:45 AM > Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Government Computer News (GCN) > Interview -Mentioned Our Work > > > Of course, adoption of ebXML Registry is a much easier process than with > > many other types of open standards, as ebXML Registry is the only open > > standard that provides the functionality that it provides > > (registration/storage/discovery/maintainance of XML and non-XML > > artifacts). > > > > And, as I was reminded at the XML.gov working group meeting yesterday, > > lots of US federal folks are waiting for "native" handling of > > fine-grained entities such as elements/attributes/datatypes/namespace > > identifiers (my "big 4"). I told them that we are moving closer to this > > with our SCM work, which is helping lay the groundwork for these native > > capabilities. What I'm basically trying to say is that US federal folks > > want to be able to pick up an ebXML Registry spec (or TN) and see these > > items called out specifically. > > > > Joe > > > > Duane Nickull wrote: > > > > > > David: > > > > > > You are right - that is true. We ahd this discussion in Amsterdam. > > > > > > I guess a corrected statement is they will formally adopt it in a "Best > > > Practice" document or similar. > > > > > > Duane > > > > > > David RR Webber wrote: > > > > > > >Duane, > > > > > > > >I'm not sure the eGov TC formally adopts anything! > > > > > > > >I may be mis-speaking here - but the role is more of > > > >providing guidelines and best practice details in an > > > >advisory capacity. > > > > > > > >There is no sense of obligation that compells use. > > > > > > > >That said - it is obviously useful if the eGov TC > > > >produces a white paper on Registry and eGov, > > > >similar to the one already in progress for ebMS > > > >and eGov. > > > > > > > >Thanks, DW > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> > > > >To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> > > > >Cc: "SCM" <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org> > > > >Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 8:57 AM > > > >Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Government Computer News (GCN) > Interview - > > > >Mentioned Our Work > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Farrukh also did a great presentation in Amsterdam for registry!!! It > > > >>resonated well with the eGovernment group and I would place heavy odds > > > >>that they formally adopt ebXML Regrep. > > > >> > > > >>Duane > > > >> > > > >>Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>>Yesterday I had my (twice-postoned) GCN interview on Web Services > > > >>>standards. Normally a 30-minute session, the interview lasted 2 > hours. I > > > >>>described our subcommittee's work in detail from the perspective of > Web > > > >>>Services. > > > >>> > > > >>>Of course, since the printed article will only be one full page, I > > > >>>cannot guarantee that these points will make it into the printed > version > > > >>>- but I wanted to let everyone know that I emphasized them. > > > >>> > > > >>>Joe > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>-- > > > >>Senior Standards Strategist > > > >>Adobe Systems, Inc. > > > >>http://www.adobe.com > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Senior Standards Strategist > > > Adobe Systems, Inc. > > > http://www.adobe.com > > > > -- > > Kind Regards, > > Joseph Chiusano > > Associate > > Booz | Allen | Hamilton > > -- Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]