Reg/Rep + Reasoning Use Cases

["Jeff Pollock" <Jeff.Pollock@networkinference.com>]

Farrukh and SCM team-

 

I've attached a candidate use case document with three use cases:

• 11 - Reason on Reg/Rep Content Objects (via RIM Query Interfaces)
• 12 - Reason on Reg/Rep Schema Directly (Tight Binding with OWL)
• 13 - Reason on Reg/Rep Schema Directly (Loose Binding with OWL)

These tend to be architectural use cases, contemplating different mechanisms for accomplishing common business goals. All three "include" a common use case "Infer Semantics on Content Objects." Number 11 does no reasoning on the RIM directly.  Numbers 12 & 13 support reasoning on the RIM directly via OWL interfaces, but consider different binding mechanisms.

 

I've attempted be as clear as possible, but the writing and thinking raised more issues, some of which I only alluded to.  I look forward to everyone's thoughts.

 

Best Regards,

 

-Jeff-

 

---

	Jeff T. Pollock Vice President, Technology Main: 760-476-0650 Direct: 415-971-2223 Fax: 760-476-0648 Web: www.networkinference.com Email: jeff.pollock@networkinference.com
5900 La Place Ct., Suite 250 Carlsbad, CA 92008 When OWL speaks, we understand.

 

UseCaseRegistrySemanticContentManagement-ReasoningSubset.doc