Re: [regrep-semantic] Reg/Rep + Reasoning Use Cases

[ewallace@cme.nist.gov]

Farrukh wrote:

>I found the document very well thought out and a very good articulation 
>of the alternative design approaches for supporting reasoning in the 
>context of our SCM work.

Will there be any minutes from today's telecon?  Were any decisions taken?

>Lastly, I think we should include in our planned deliverables a concrete 
>binding between OWL and RIM and leave other Ontology languages
>to be defined elsewhere. I think even in the loosely coupled approach we 
>need to make sure that OWL support is explicitly defined.

This implies to me that you chose alternative 3.?

-Evan

Evan K. Wallace
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
NIST
ewallace@nist.gov