[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: Deploying an OWL ontology via an Web Servicesinterface]
Joe, Geographic Markup is a very tough domain - and the GML is about the most extensive use of XML out there. However - if we can provide some value that's all good. This may be very tough ore to mine however... DW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> To: "SCM" <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 10:06 AM Subject: [Fwd: Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: Deploying an OWL ontology via an Web Servicesinterface] > Forwarding this very positive response back to our subcommittee. > According to the poster, our work is "exactly what I have been looking > for". > > Joe > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Re: Deploying an OWL ontology via an Web > Servicesinterface > Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 00:02:36 +1000 > From: Rob Atkinson <rob@socialchange.net.au> > To: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@bah.com> > CC: public-sws-ig@w3.org, carlmattocks@checkmi.com,Simon Cox > <simon.cox@csiro.au>,Keiran Millard <k.millard@hrwallingford.co.uk> > References: <409EBABC.6020002@socialchange.net.au> > <409F768B.C8E841A4@bah.com> > <60384.216.163.247.1.1084196718.squirrel@webmail.netcarrier.com> > <409F8902.EE2C4E80@bah.com> > > Many thanks - I think this is exactly what I have been looking for - not > exactly an answer but something to include in the roadmaps I am working > on! > > In fact, my use case is very much one based on reconciling ebRIM and ISO > 19000 standards for modelling geographical features, so this path is > promising. I was thinking of OWL as a view into relationships managed > within ebRIM data models as a starting point, and loading an ontology > into ebRIM so I could then manage the terms! > > Thanks to all those who responded with details of their current > solutions - I guess this discussion would have been of broad interest. > > I'll spend a bit more time reading and thinking through then respond > directly. > > > Regards > Rob Atkinson > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > >Forwarding on behalf of Carl Mattocks, Co-Chair of OASIS/ebXML Registry > >SCM subcommittee. > > > >Kind Regards, > >Joe Chiusano > >Booz | Allen | Hamilton > >Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > > > >Carl Mattocks wrote: > > > >Rob : > > > >Yes - the ebXML Registry Semantic Content Management are actively > >working to enable community managed ontologies. If you would like to > >provide feedback on the 'use cases' we have developed- please let me > >know. > > > >regards > >carl > > > > > >><quote who="Chiusano Joseph"> > >> > >> > >>>I would like to call your attention to the work that is currently being > >>>done in the OASIS/ebXML Registry SCM (Semantic Content Management) > >>>subcommittee [1]. A link to the group's charter is also listed in [1]. > >>> > >>>I've copied the SCM listserv in case any of the members that are on this > >>>list would like to provide more information. > >>> > >>>Kind Regards, > >>>Joe Chiusano > >>>Booz | Allen | Hamilton > >>>Strategy and Technology Consultants to the World > >>> > >>>[1] > >>>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/sc_home.php?wg_abbrev=regrep-semanti c > >>> > >>>Rob Atkinson wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hi > >>>> > >>>>Apologies if there is an obvious answer to this, but I havent been able > >>>>to locate it via browsing, searching or asking yet: is there a working > >>>>group, standard, best practice or even published proprietary API for > >>>>deploying an ontology via Web Services. > >>>> > >>>>I am interested in the case of a community managed ontology, where > >>>>working groups can be delegated to maintain parts of the ontology, all > >>>>via a single web accessible repository. Applications would be able to > >>>>search this repository as required. > >>>> > >>>>I would like the ability to: > >>>>1) insert, update or delete classes > >>>>2) find references that directly depend on a class > >>>>3) query > >>>>4) ideally, insert an entire OWL ontology including relationships to > >>>>pre-existing classes... > >>>>5) ... which implies having a stable URI to reference items within the > >>>>deployed ontology in the first place > >>>> > >>>>Maybe there is no API that makes sense, and its always only possible to > >>>>think about publishing a single file, and using xlink to try to glue it > >>>>all together - in which case there should be some serious thought > >>>>somewhere about the query mechanisms you would use to perform typical > >>>>ontology traversals. I'd be happy with a registry-friendly model where > >>>>the transactions can be defined to be honest. > >>>> > >>>>Can anyone point me to where such deployment issues are being worked > >>>>out? > >>>> > >>>>Regards > >>>>Rob Atkinson > >>>> > >>>> > >>>-- > >>>Kind Regards, > >>>Joseph Chiusano > >>>Associate > >>>Booz | Allen | Hamilton > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>-- > >>Carl Mattocks > >> > >>co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC > >>co-Chair OASIS Business Centric Methodology TC > >>CEO CHECKMi > >>v/f (usa) 908 322 8715 > >>www.CHECKMi.com > >>Semantically Smart Compendiums > >>(AOL) IM CarlCHECKMi > >> > >> > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]