Re: [regrep-semantic] Fw: OMG RAS and Registry

[ewallace@cme.nist.gov]

It doesn't make sense to me for SCM SC to do this.  RAS is about software
development artifacts, not semantics.

-Evan


>Does it make sense to add this as a use case, and create 
>technical note around their XML packaging?
>
>DW
>
>> OMG Membership Approves Adoption of Reusable Software Assets (RAS)
>> Standard.
>> 
>> The Object Management Group (OMG) announced that its members have voted
>> to adopt the "Reusable Asset Specification (RAS)," which defines a
>> standard way to package reusable software assets -- incorporating
>> artifacts like requirements documents, models, source code files,
>> deployment descriptors, test cases, and scripts. An asset package
>> includes artifacts and an XML manifest document. RAS XML Schemas
>> authoritatively defines RAS manifest document structures.
>> 
>> http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2004-05-07-a.html