Re: [regrep-semantic] Fw: OMG RAS and Registry

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Evan,

Good point!

Therefore - this may just be something the main registry list
tackles?

The SCM stuff provides re-usable semantics and discovery
for the RAS objects - but nothing special for RAS there.

Thanks, DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
To: <regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org>; <david@drrw.info>
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] Fw: OMG RAS and Registry


>
> It doesn't make sense to me for SCM SC to do this.  RAS is about software
> development artifacts, not semantics.
>
> -Evan
>
>
> >Does it make sense to add this as a use case, and create
> >technical note around their XML packaging?
> >
> >DW
> >
> >> OMG Membership Approves Adoption of Reusable Software Assets (RAS)
> >> Standard.
> >>
> >> The Object Management Group (OMG) announced that its members have voted
> >> to adopt the "Reusable Asset Specification (RAS)," which defines a
> >> standard way to package reusable software assets -- incorporating
> >> artifacts like requirements documents, models, source code files,
> >> deployment descriptors, test cases, and scripts. An asset package
> >> includes artifacts and an XML manifest document. RAS XML Schemas
> >> authoritatively defines RAS manifest document structures.
> >>
> >> http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2004-05-07-a.html
>
>
>