[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] revised SCM Use Case document (second attempt to send)
David Webber wrote: >Attached is my revisions to this. Use Case 2 looked very good - only >couple of nits there, Use Case 1 also - most changes made sense - I >retained the reference to creating the noun mechanism but updated it >to fit with your edits. I changed reference to STEP to community - >(noone knows what the ISO standard code is!?) - but everyone >recognizes STEP and UDEF, et al. ... Neither of us used the ISO standard code (10303 for STEP). I included the official designation for the subcommittee that created the STEP standard(s) and a number of other standards for Industrial Data exchange. I assumed that a reader might need to dereference that designation, but that could easily be done with little chance of an incorrect interpretation. Of course, I was trying to do as little damage as possible to the meaning and flow of your text. -Evan
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]