[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] UDDI intel
Regarding UDDI and ebXML, please see my posting [1] to ebXML-dev of yesterday, in which I cite several articles of mine that are on this topic. Hope they're helpful. Joe [1] http://lists.ebxml.org/archives/ebxml-dev/200407/msg00053.html Jeff Pollock wrote: > > In general. > > The ebXML SCM approach to incorporating OWL is quite RIM-specific I > think. > > -Jeff- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 12:32 PM > To: Registry TC - SCM SC > Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] UDDI intel > > Jeff, > > Are you speaking about UDDI in general? Or their approach to > incorporating OWL? > > Joe > > Jeff Pollock wrote: > > > > All- > > > > Most of you must have heard this already, but it appears that UDDI 3.0 > > is pointed towards an OWL interface as well. > > > > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/group_public/document.php?document_id=618 > > 9&wg_abbrev=uddi-spec > > > > What is this group's opinion about UDDI? Is it a competitive > approach, > > or is it complementary? > > > > -Jeff- > > -- > Kind Regards, > Joseph Chiusano > Associate > Booz | Allen | Hamilton -- Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]