[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep-semantic] SCM 2 month conference call Hiatus
Farrukh et al, Please send your comments related to the proposed draft IPR policy to ipr-member-review@lists.oasis-open.org. That is how your concerns will be heard. They are not monitoring our list. Thanks. Kathryn -----Original Message----- From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 1:56 PM To: regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] SCM 2 month conference call Hiatus Carl Mattocks wrote: >Gentle SCM Folks : > >Farrukh & I are in agreement that the success of this sub-committees >work is highly dependent on two factors which have an uncertain short >term future : > >The ebXMLRegistry RIM - which is now in an alpha stage of its third >version. > > To add to Carls statement above... We are currently focused on getting ebXML Registry 3.0 specifications finalized and submitted to OASIS. This requires a great deal of effort which makes it hard to concentrate on SCM SC in the interim period. Since ebXML Registry 3.0 will be a foundation to build SCM SC work on we feel it makes sense to focus on it until it is submitted to OASIS. Thanks. >The ability of Individual Members to continue making contributions - >which are subject to the major changes in requirements for Individual >Members included in the recent proposed IPR Policy. e.g. Individual >Membership would no longer be available to anyone whose IP is owned by >his or her employer (as required by most employment agreements). >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/members-only/download.php/ >7515 > FAQ >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/members-only/download.php/ 7554 > > Above OASIS policy change concerns me as so many solid contributors to OASIS TCs are individual members. Is there not a way to allow individual membership to continue provisional upon the Individual Member providing some sort of waiver from his employer regarding IP contributions? Surely something could be worked out here? > >We therefore propose to take a 2 month haitus from Conference Calls and >limit conversations to the list server. This will allow us to maintain >a documented trail of all discussions should we need to reference them >for IP purposes. > >your earnest comments please ? > > >Thanking you for your support thus far > >Carl & Farrukh > > >co-Chair OASIS (ISO/TS 15000) ebXMLRegistry Semantic Content SC > > > -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]