[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep-semantic] ebXML Registry Profile for OWL Draft 1: Farrukhscomments #1
asuman wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > These emails are very technical. So I will appreciate if we use > only the regrep-semantic@lists.oasis-open.org and > staff@srdc.metu.edu.tr threads. Just to clarify, Asuman meant to not copy the emails to the Dr. Frederix, Prof. Tokyay and Prof. Gumrah. I would go a step further and say that we should only copy SC list and its members. The list is open so any one can join who is on the staff@srdc.metu.edu.tr list. Sound ok? > > Thank you. > > Asuman > > ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: > >> A few other comments on Farrukh's comments: >> >> >> >>> Line 187-189: >>> >>> "In OWL, properties can have >>> multiple domains and multiple ranges. Multiple domain (range) >>> expressions restrict the domain (range) of >>> a property to the intersection of the class expressions." >>> >>> Suggest having a reference to domain/range definition for those that >>> are not familiar with these terms. >>> >> >> I was actually surprised to see the above comment in this document as >> it is a fairly esoteric point. It may be important to how the >> Profile was implemented, >> but if not, I would suggest removing it entirely. >> >> ... >> >> >> >>> Line 522: >>> >>> regrep:AssociationType:Property => regrep:AssociationType:HasProperty >>> >>> This is more consistent with existing assoc types (+) but does not >>> preserve the OWL element name exactly (-). >>> If we do above change then we may want to suggest adding above to >>> canonical AssociationType scheme as it is fairly generic. >>> >> >> I would strongly advise against this change. Properties are first >> class elements in RDFS and OWL. What is it that "has" the Property >> above - an ontology? If at all possible, please use the OWL, RDFS >> and RDF terms verbatim. >> >> ... >> >> >> >>> Line 613: >>> >>> "OWL-S Profile" >>> >>> => Suggest using namespace prefix and have a table of all namespace >>> prefixes somewhere in Intro to OWL chapter >>> >>> "owls:Profile" >>> >> >> References to OWL-S would not belong in an OWL chapter since OWL-S is >> not >> part of the OWL language, but rather a source of OWL ontologies used in >> examples in the Profile document. >> >> -Evan >> >> >> >> >> > > -- Regards, Farrukh
begin:vcard fn:Farrukh Najmi n:Najmi;Farrukh email;internet:farrukh.najmi@sun.com tel;work:781-442-9017 url:http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/farrukhRacePointIcon.jpg version:2.1 end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]