[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Positioning with UDDI (was RE: Tactical Proposal: Split V2 wo rk items into V2 and V3 (repost))
Message text written by "Munter, Joel D" > My point in bringing up the idea this way is to highlight that we probably need to establish a separate sub-team, we should brainstorm various interoperability alternatives, and do real work on this. Joel< >>>>>>>>>>>>> Procedurally the only way we can do this right now is to define our own system and then submit this to UDDI and ask them if functionally they can implement their use cases using our specifications. Since this gives us instant alignment - the appeal is obvious - but I probably just farted in church as far as the politics are concerned. Although if one thinks on this logically from a pure technical stance - I'd bet this is much closer to being attainable than not - since we already know what UDDI needs anyway. In fact the UDDI can be viewed in many ways as an optional extension layer on top of the ebXML base - and I think perhaps this was Farrukh's thinking here... DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC