[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Please comment on new RIM format
Dan, That sounds like a good suggestion as it clearly and further delineates attributes from methods. However, there is one down side that I can see. It would lead to common use of 4 level deep section headers and occasional use of 5 level deep section headers (when dealing with enumeration values such as objectType). That would be undesirable would it not? What do people think? Which is a clearer read? Which is more understandable? Dan Chang wrote: > Here are my two cents. I think the format will be more balanced if we have: > > 7.1 Class RegistryObject > 7.1.1 RegistryObject Attributes > 7.1.1 Attribute accessControlPolicy > 7.1.1.2 Attribute ... > 7.1.2 RegistryObject Methods > 7.1.2.1 Method getAssociatedObjects() > 7.1.2.2 Method ... > > Regards, Dan > > e-business Data Technology and Standard > IBM Silicon Valley Laboratory > Notes: Dan Chang/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS > Internet: dtchang@us.ibm.com > VM: IBMUSM50(DTCHANG) > Phone: (408)-463-2319 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> -- Regards, Farrukh
begin:vcard n:Najmi;Farrukh tel;work:781-442-0703 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.sun.com org:Sun Microsystems;Java Software adr:;;1 Network Dr. MS BUR02-302;Burlington;MA;01803-0902;USA version:2.1 email;internet:najmi@east.sun.com fn:Farrukh Najmi end:vcard
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC