RE: [regrep] Query Proposal Vote

["Smith, Neal L. (NLSM)" <NLSM@chevrontexaco.com>]

Disapprove.

I would like to see a statement of direction added, to the effect that W3C
XQuery, when it becomes an approved recommendation, would be an acceptable
alternative to Query Management Service. In other words, QMS is not required
for RS conformance if the RS support XQuery.

I realize XQuery is still a working draft and we may need to continue
developing QMS for now.  But I would like to clearly establish that there is
little long-term need for it.

Neal Smith
ChevronTexaco

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Lisa Carnahan [SMTP:lisa.carnahan@nist.gov]
> Sent:	Thursday, October 18, 2001 5:25 AM
> To:	regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject:	[regrep] Query Proposal Vote
> 
> To OASIS/ebXML Registry TC Voting Members,
> 
> This is a ballot on the Query Proposal attached to the archived message
> referenced below.  
> 
> Please indicate your vote as Approve, Disapprove or Abstain to the
> Proposal.  Please indicate your vote to me by sending me email directly to
> lisa.carnahan@nist.gov.   (You may  send your vote to the TC list; however
> you are certainly not required to do so.) Please send your response by
> Tuesday, October 22.
> 
> The Query Proposal can be found at:
> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200110/msg00038.html>
> 
> 
> I'm still out of the office, if you wish to discuss this vote, please
> contact me on Monday.
> 
> --thanks
> -lisa
>