RE: [regrep] Security Proposal vote

["Munter, Joel D" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>]

update: i should have made myself more clear.  i abstain due to the simple truth that i do not understand what i am "voting on."  will the material within these documents constitute the changes that still need to be made to the RS and RIM specifications?  is the vote of the two of these attached sets of material (RS changes and DSIG changes) dependent upon each other.  i am in total agreement with Len Gallagher here that any content changes to the RS or RIM spec itself need to be specifically addressed.  e.g., change lines xxx through yyy in RS with "blah, blah, blah" or add sections "such and such."  until i see the specifics, i choose to not vote.

joel 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Munter, Joel D
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 9:10 AM
To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [regrep] Security Proposal vote

abstain.  joel

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lisa Carnahan [mailto:lisa.carnahan@nist.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:53 PM
To: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [regrep] Security Proposal vote

To OASIS/ebXML Registry TC Voting 
Members,

This is a ballot on the Security Proposal attached to the 
archived message referenced below. 

Please indicate your vote as 
Approve, Disapprove or Abstain to the Proposal. Please indicate your vote 
by sending email to the TC mailing list.  Please send your response 
by Tuesday, October 30. 

The Security Proposal can be found at: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/regrep/200110/msg00005.html  
.

--lisa