[regrep] Re: Core Components Specifications

[David RR Webber - XMLGlobal <Gnosis_@compuserve.com>]

Message text written by bhaugen
>Would it help to get out of these endless and fruitless
argument loops to agree that:
* UML is for models that are independent of
  implementation technology
* XML is an implementation technology
* People can work at whichever level 
  is most appropriate for what they
  are trying to do
<<<<<<

Bob,

Exactly.  And trying to mandate one or the other is 
equally illogical.

We're providing the means to work with both.  So lets
just continue and have a clear a simple statement
to that effect.

Thanks, DW.