[regrep] Re: Core Components Specifications

[Duane Nickull <duane@xmlglobal.com>]

Sandy Klausner wrote:
> 
> Duane,
> > Why do you think the Core Component needs to be an executable?
> 
> Neither XML or UML directly represent behavior. We need a way to converge
> syntax and semantics from our modeling domains with programming language
> domains. Without such a singular concrete model, it is hard to conceive the
> development of a core component infrastructure that is truly scalable and
> reusable. This is a very short answer to a very deep subject.
> Sandy
>>>>>>>>>
sandy:

I cannot find anything in the CC spec v 1.75 which indicates this is a
requirement of Core COmponents.  Since it is also not a constraint
imposed by the architecture document, where do you derive that a Core
Component is a program?

Does anyone else subscribe to Sandy's theory?

Duane

-- 
CTO, XML Global Technologies
****************************
Transformation - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/foundation/
ebXML Central - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/central/