[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [regrep] Re: Core Components Specifications
Philip Goatly wrote: > > Folks, > > I remember when IT was called dataprocessing - Well CC represents data and > nedd to be bound to process/es >>>>>>>>> I concur. That is why we have a bunch of really smart people working out the processes in the BP related teams. They liaise with the CC teams so we get this functionality. I still assert: "If you model your information and processes properly, you should end up with all the information properly separated from the processes. "nouns" in the core components and all the "verbs" in the processes. Anything less MAY be a mistake in the modelling." I would like to hear from the UMM and UML heads to see if they agree with this notion. (no flames please) \ Duane -- CTO, XML Global Technologies **************************** Transformation - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/foundation/ ebXML Central - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/central/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC