[regrep] RE: Reg Rep Requirement for UID scheme - Question?

["Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>]

resending...

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Breininger, Kathryn R  
> Sent:	Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:36 AM
> To:	'ebXML Regrep'
> Subject:	FW: Reg Rep Requirement for UID scheme - Question?
> 
> Team,
> I have a question that came in about the UIDs.  I have forwarded the note.
> Let's talk about this during our telecon tomorrow.
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Warner, Thomas  
> Sent:	Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:42 AM
> To:	Breininger, Kathryn R
> Subject:	Reg Rep Requirement for UID scheme - Question?
> 
> 
> Kathryn 
> Did you see my note from the Seattle EBTWG meeting and my question about a
> Reg Rep Requiremetn that all UIDs be 6 digits random.  Can you verify that
> Reg Rep owns UID spec and that this is correct?
> 
> MY original note:
> I attempted to contribute the Aerospace Industry UDEF Code to the Core
> Component team as a logical identification method for the Core Components
> Universal ID requirement.  I was assured that the UID was only a temporary
> numbering scheme to be assigned for "CCs in work".  The CC leadership
> deferred to the Registry and Repository Team (in OASIS) for actual
> consideration of any logical UID.  They said that Reg Rep folks were
> already looking at a more logical identification scheme, such as UDEF, for
> final UID of CCs.  However, the OASIS RegRep folks are the ones who
> specified that the UID is to be 6 digits.  It sounds like a buck passing
> exercise.  (Do we have anyone who can track down the facts?)  Kathryn??
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Tom