[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] RE: [uddi-spec] ebXML Registry / UDDI Convergence
David RR Webber - XMLGlobal wrote: > The big difference I see is the formal replicated v federated models, > coupled with the tModel/WSDL v ebXML architecture stack. >>>>>>>> David: As the one who wrote a large portion of that architecture, I see no hinderence in the TechArch to this convergence. The ebXML and WS set of standards are both event based architectures. It is a fact that you can reference a WSDL doc from an ebXML registry today. IN fact, using the UID mechanism, you can even relay the semantics of the WSDL parameters beyond just the minor clues the element names give. In fact, one might argue that if this tech stack goes ahead, why not harmonize the next layers as well. What about using the ebXML Messaging standard for WSDL transport? Think about this. ebXML Messaging would allow companies to formally constrain access to Web Services to external users who must have a formal trading partner agreement to use that web service. It would also provide all the mechanisms for full security, persistent message store and non-repudiation/authentication and proper thread tracking (via conversationID + cpaID). Building on that, imagine the WSDL parameters being build using ebXML CC's and BIE's. Hmmm. D -- VP Strategic Relations, Technologies Evangelist XML Global Technologies **************************** ebXML software downloads - http://www.xmlglobal.com/prod/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC