OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa Fe


Thanks Anne.

All, here is the pertinent URL: 
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/uddi-spec/200301/msg00010.html

Joe

Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> 
> It hasn't been published yet. But you can find the draft in the uddi-spec
> discussion list archives.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:55 PM
> > To: Munter Joel D
> > Cc: Matthew MacKenzie; Anne Thomas Manes; Max Voskob; Still Erik R;
> > OASIS regrep
> > Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa
> > Fe
> >
> >
> > Thanks Joel.  The only technical note I see published on the UDDI site
> > is "Providing a Taxonomy for Use in UDDI Version 2".  Is there a URL
> > available for the technical note your refer to?
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > "Munter, Joel D" wrote:
> > >
> > > Seeing ebXML based services "registered" in a UDDI registry
> > > (semi-private or the public UBR) and therefore discoverable in a demo
> > > may go a long way toward eliminating some confusion.
> > >
> > > The Technical note being drafted by Kibakura-san (Fujitsu) and being
> > > discussed on the UDDI-spec dist list has come along way.  I recommend
> > > that you all read this and comment as you need to.
> > >
> > > Joel Munter, Intel
> > > desk: 480.552.3076
> > > cell:  602.790.0924
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:13 AM
> > > To: Matthew MacKenzie
> > > Cc: Anne Thomas Manes; Max Voskob; Still Erik R; OASIS regrep
> > > Subject: Re: [regrep] Describing ebXML Reg/Rep - observations from Santa
> > > Fe
> > >
> > > One way to help remedy this perception might be to present on
> > > "Registering Web Services in an ebXML Registry" at some of the Web
> > > services conferences, such as Web Services One.
> > >
> > > Some other things that might help are the Best Practices paper on
> > > registering Web services in an ebXML Registry (currently in progress),
> > > and perhaps in the future a high-level mapping between the 2 registry
> > > architectures (such as "ebXML Registry Classification is *roughly*
> > > equivalent to UDDI categoryBag", "ebXML Organization is *roughly*
> > > equivalent to UDDI businessEntity", etc.)
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > Matthew MacKenzie wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Anne,
> > > >
> > > > You're right on.  ebXML != Web Services, at least not general
> > > > perception wise.  I'd like to see that changed somewhat, ebXML
> > > > messaging is web services based, and ebXML registry is a web service.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday, Jan 30, 2003, at 07:40 America/Vancouver, Anne Thomas
> > > > Manes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I think RegRep's biggest issue is that it's so closely associated
> > > with
> > > > > ebXML, and when most people think of Web services, they think of
> > > SOAP,
> > > > > not
> > > > > ebXML. Likewise, when they think of a Web services registry, they
> > > > > think of
> > > > > UDDI.
> >

Attachment: Chiusano_Joseph.vcf
Description: Card for Joseph Chiusano



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC