[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] ebXML Reg Rep & UDDI interoperability
Matthew, sorry, I'm in MS camp. Have no idea about JARX. I'm not talking about a particular vendor-specific implementation. I'm talking about providing a mapping and recommendations at the spec level so it can be implemented on any platform. Cheers, Max ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew MacKenzie" <matt@mac-kenzie.net> To: "Max Voskob" <mvoskob@msi.net.nz> Cc: "OASIS_RegRep (E-mail)" <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [regrep] ebXML Reg Rep & UDDI interoperability > Max, > > Check out JAXR. It's business query interface is somewhat like UDDI and > it has already done the work for mapping between data models. > > -Matt > > Max Voskob wrote: > > >Hi guys, > > > >As you know, I'm just watching your TC like fly on the wall, but sometimes I > >stretch my wings and make a little buzz. So here we go bzzzz :) > > > >I'm not sure if you discussed this option before, but I thought of providing > >some UDDI interfaces to your Registry. > > > >Lets say that an organization is using a web-services platform, but they > >want to use Reg/Rep as well. It would be very inconvenient to have 2 > >registries - UDDI and Reg/Rep. Why can't they talk to Reg/Rep thru UDDI > >interfaces? > >I don't think that implementing all UDDI interfaces is a wise idea, but the > >query interface would definitely come handy. > > > >Still sounds weird? Think again! ;) > > > >Cheers, > >Max > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- > >To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > >manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC