Re: [regrep] Implementing CCTS in Registry - further thoughts

[Matthew MacKenzie <matt@mac-kenzie.net>]

I don't see how a sub team of registry for defining a serialization 
format for core components makes sense.  Sure, we have the people who 
can get it done here, but it doesn't fit.

We could always start Yet-Another-Oasis-TC...

-Matt

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:

>Message text written by Matthew MacKenzie
>  
>
>I don't advocate people calling any home cooked XML or CSV a core 
>component in their XML registry...I think that will just muddy the waters.
>
><<<
>
>Matt,
>
>FYI - there are a dozen registries out there already with their
>own XML formats for content.
>
>Having the ATG specify XML for an OASIS Registry IMHO
>is a fraught path.
>
>My suggestion is a sub-team of Registry - and we have a
>collaborative effort between the concerned parties:
>
>My list would include UBL, CAM, UDDI, CCTS, ATG, and 
>then other OASIS TC's that want to liaise, along with 
>invite to OAGI and DISA X12 to have an observer each.
>
>DW.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>  
>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature