Re: [regrep] Summary: Implementing CCTS in Registry

[Farrukh Najmi <farrukh.najmi@sun.com>]

David RR Webber - XML ebusiness wrote:

>My 2 cents is that CC registration/discovery includes
>assembly - unless you duck the BIE part of the spec' and
>do only atomic core components for now, or simply state
>that people provide their own assembly mechanism(s),
>and mention some of the options they have to achieve 
>that:  schema / xslt / CAM / other scripts (Perl, JavaScript, et al).
>
Indeed CC registration/discovery may well include assembly from the 
perspective of the component assembler / author.

However, we are the ebXML Registry TC and from the registry's 
perspective, I believe that primitive components (for the assembly 
process) and the assembled components can be registered/discovered in 
registry based on current speced features.

In other words unless someone defines specific use case(s) where 
registry must address a CAM requirement and does not do so currently, I 
will assume that we can and should keep assembly out of scope.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh