Re: [regrep] Core Components and XML Serialization - Which Approach?

[Farrukh Najmi <farrukh.najmi@sun.com>]

Chiusano Joseph wrote:

><Quote1>
>UDDI does not expose any client API to enable clients to effect
>replication.
></Quote1>
>
>UDDI v3 has a Replication API.
>
Which is not a client API but a Service Provider API not meant for use 
by users of registry.

>
><Quote2>
>ebXML Registry and UDDI have very little in common at this point.
>Hopefully this will change in the future.
></Quote2>
>

>
>I respectly differ (on the first sentence), when comparing the V3 specs
>of both registries.  I believe that notwithstanding the obvious "main
>focus" of each registry, from a high-level functionality perspective the
>2 registries have more in common than many people are aware of. 
>
The above quote was specific to teh area of replication which was the 
topic of interest. I will not say any more on this thread.


-- 
Regards,
Farrukh




----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>