Re: [regrep] ebXML Registry "Brochure" (Was Re: [regrep] PR for specs)

[Duane Nickull <duane@yellowdragonsoft.com>]

I would agree that the order you present is quick logical.

D

Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> <Quote>
> How do people see the relative priority of above 3 possibilities? 
> </Quote>
> 
> I see them in the order listed, with (a) highest priority.
> 
> Joe
> 
> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> 
>>Duane Nickull wrote:
>>
>>
>>>+1 agree! I have three days of registry slides to pick from and will
>>>try to bring down to 10 slides as a possible start point.
>>>
>>>One of my contacts is just starting the job of perusing 180+ pages of
>>>registry spec. His comments indicate the need for a quickstart guide.
>>>
>>
>>So far we have:
>>
>>a) Registry brochure
>>
>>b) Registry quick start guide
>>
>>and I would like to add as a possibility
>>
>>c) Registry Tutorial
>>
>>I see (a) being very light weight and high impact. I see (b) being a
>>litle more meat than (a). I see (c) being quite detailed but designed
>>according to use cases and filled with examples. A few good examples
>>come to mind:
>>
>>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/
>>http://java.sun.com/webservices/docs/1.1/tutorial/doc/
>>
>>How do people see the relative priority of above 3 possibilities? It
>>would be great to hear from actual users trying to grapple with the
>>specs even if they are not TC members.
>>
>>--
>>Farrukh
> 


-- 
Yellow Dragon Software Corp. - http://www.yellowdragonsoft.com
Service Oriented Architectures - ebXML, Web Services, Registry, SOAP
Project Team lead - United Nations CEFACT eBusiness Architecture
+1 (604) 738-1051
***********************************