Re: [regrep] WSDL Issues

["Anne Thomas Manes" <anne@manes.net>]

I recommend using the proposed WSDL 1.2 binding (although it may go away in
the future).
IBM has published a schema for a MIME binding [1]. Thanks. I'll go revise
the WSDL based on this info.

[1] http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/mime/


----- Original Message -----
From: "Farrukh Najmi" <farrukh.najmi@sun.com>
To: "Anne Thomas Manes" <anne@manes.net>
Cc: <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>; "matt" <matt@yellowdragonsoft.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [regrep] WSDL Issues


> Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
>
> >Some questions and comments:
> >
> >
> >If partContent is required to be included in the input message, why is it
> >not included in the message structure?  Also, keep in mind that WS-I BP
> >permits only one <part> on document/literal messages, so to be WS-I
> >compliant, you would have to include it in the message structure.
> >
> >One reason why you might want to define multiple parts in a message
> >definition is to define header or headerfault messages (which should
always
> >be defined as document/literal) -- but in that case you should always
> >reference the specific part to be used in the <binding> elements. e.g.:
> >
> >   <message name='foo'>
> >      <part name='body' element='foobody' />
> >      <part name='header' element='fooheader' />
> >      <part name='headerfault' element='fooheaderfault' />
> >   </message>
> >
> >   <soap:body parts='body' use='literal' />
> >   <soap:header message='tns:foo' part='header' use='literal' />
> >   <soap:headerfault message='tns:foo' part='headerfault' use='literal'
/>
> >
> >Bottom line: the three messages containing partContent have to be fixed.
> >
> >
> >
> Anne, the messages with partContent are those that are supposed to
> support mime attachments. Clearly we seem to have lost
>
> <mime:multipartRelated>
>
> in the input and output element defs for these operations. I suspect
> this was silently swallowed by a tool I used. I will doublecheck this.
>
> I know that WS-I BP does not touch attachments. Are there any other
> considerations besides just following?
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-bindings-20030611/#_mime
>
>
>
> --
> Farrukh
>
>
>
> You may leave a Technical Committee at any time by visiting
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.
php
>