[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] UDDI as the registry for ebXML components: Typo?
I'm not sure that the hierarchical design you're proposing would work, though. The relationship between <service> and <binding> is many-to-many. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David RR Webber - XML ebusiness" <Gnosis_@compuserve.com> To: "Anne Thomas Manes" <anne@manes.net> Cc: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>; <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Duane Nickull" <duane@yellowdragonsoft.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:01 PM Subject: Re: [regrep] UDDI as the registry for ebXML components: Typo? > Message text written by "Anne Thomas Manes" > >And, by the way, WSDL 1.1 is not repetitious. It is modular. < > > Anne, > > I just finished typing in rather of lot of these - and its a > design preference and style issue. > > I would just like to see a higher level control component > added - and then you hang the individual modules off > of that - so that you label the top of the tree, and its function(s). > and then the children inherit under their node. Right now you > have a 'mix n match' style in how WSDL is crafted. > > One mans art is anothers wash rag! ; -) > > WSDL works OK right now for simple pieces where's there > only a few things to define. The UDDI access WSDL though is > pushing the envelope on usablity IMHO for example. > > Eh, not a big deal! > > Thanks, DW. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]