[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] 7/29/2003: Conformance Efforts and ebXML IIC
Michael Kass wrote: > To all, > > Sorry about the mixup. I sent the original test requirements file. > Here is the updated one. > Mike, The updated format looks very good. A few questions follow: -What does the Requirement Level column mean? Is it saying whether the assertion is part of a required feature or an optional feature? If so maybe a more obvious column header is desirable (e.g. "Require Feature" with value true/false). -What process, responsible parties, milestones and deliverables do you you forsee going forward? -Is the end product an "ebXML Registry Conformance Test Specification (CTS)" document? -Who produces the initial set of assertions that would be the basis for the CTS? -Who produces the final CTS? -Who produces automated test suite for verifying Conformance? -What are/should be some realistic milestones for various deliverables? Thanks for taking the lead on this important work within ebXML Registry and IIC TCs. -- Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]