[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] Re: Republica Case Study (Was: Re: [regrep] Web Siteupdate request)
Chiusano Joseph wrote: ><Quote1> >"The project was not fully aligned with OASIS ebXML Standards ></Quote1> > >With all due respect to the hard work that I'm sure went into this, it >still puzzles me as to why OASIS would post something that is not in >line with the standards that have been created by an OASIS TC. I don't >believe that W3C posts products implementations that do not conform to >their Recommendations. > I respectfully disagree with your statements above. The work done by Republica is completely inline with the OASIS ebXML Registry version 2.1 standard and shows a fine example (case study) of how to apply an ebXML Registry to manage core components. The work predates the good work done in CCRIM which is still not available as a public document. Even when it is, based on current plans AFAIK it will be a non-normative technical note. It will not be an OASIS standards unless I missed a decision somewhere along the way. IMO, the Republica Case Study is not even obligated to be saying anything about CCRIM but I think it should say something along the lines of deferring to it when it is out. Diego has offered to do these changes to allay the concerns raised. I am not getting what the fuss is about. What OASIS standards are being violated? If anything this is one of the most sophisticated case studies of ebXML Registry specs that I have seen to date. I would like to respectfully request that Diego put edit the document based on input received by a set deadline and then we put the matter up for vote by the TC. FWIW, my vote is a resounding *YES* on the document whenever it is up for a vote. Thanks Diego for your valuable contributions. -- Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]