Re: [regrep] [Fwd: Usage scenarios for OMG ontology development metamodel]

["Carl Mattocks" <carlmattocks@checkmi.com>]

Enjoyed reading this "ontology development metamodel" discussion paper..
it confirmed my  perception that there will always be 'different
ontologies for different folks' thus a primary task must be to agree a
(scope) definition of ebXMLRegistry ontology usage, such as,
 is it just OWL for the Registry ? and
must it be Z39.50 for Federated Repositories ?
is there a connecting Registry / Repository  semantic layer (KIF, Topic
Map, Conceptual Graphs ) to connect OWL & Z39.50 ?

<quote who="Chiusano Joseph">
> Forwarding this e-mail from Eliot Christian of USGS, for potential
> synergy with our semantic registry enhancements for v4.
>
> It's regarding use cases for OMG ontology development metamodel (ODM).
>> Joe
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Usage scenarios for OMG ontology development metamodel
> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:44:01 -0500
> From: Eliot Christian <echristi@usgs.gov>



-- 
Carl Mattocks CEO CHECKMi
Operational Intelligence OEM
-------------------------------
e-Business Agents
Semantically Smart Compendiums
-------------------------------
v/f (usa) 908 322 8715
www.CHECKMi.com