OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [regrep] V3.0 of ebXML for SOA

It was an example. Would it make sense to have an "ebXML architecture" which could be interpreted to allow using UDDI, SOAP and BPEL instead of ebReg+ebMS+ebBP? I think not.

Implementability in a concrete sense means we need to make choices, and those choices should be ebXML components wherever possible.

On Dec 22, 2003, at 12:56 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote:

Matthew MacKenzie wrote:

If there is an ebXML Architecture, it should not be agnostic to implementation.

I think I understand above to mean that ebXML Architecture should be implementable and not some pie-in-sky that has no basis in reality. If so I agree.

In other words, ebxml-bp should be specified over BPEL.

Now you have lost me. What does line above have to do with the first statement?


Matthew MacKenzie
Senior Architect
Intelligent Documents Business Unit
Adobe Systems Canada Inc.
506 869.0175

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]