[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [regrep] RDF Data Access WG Charter
Chiusano Joseph wrote: ><Quote> >To be very clear, the ideal situation from my perspective is that RDF DA >WG accept ebXML Registry V4 as RDF DA API and help us meet all >requiremjents identified for RDF DA. ></Quote> > >Not to discourage by any means, but realistically what are the chances >that that will happen? > > There is always a gap between ideal and real. Despite being pathelogically optimistic, I do not believe that the ideal situation is attainable. It was mentioned in the broader context of explaining the relationship of ebXML Registry and its Semantic Content Management fetaures to RDF DA. I have a tendency to describe things starting with an idealized vision and then laying out a more realistic path towards that vision. Realistically the best we can hope for is to engage in RDF DA WG and contribute actively a solution that meets the RDF DA WG requirements and fits well with ebXML Registry. To that end the first step is to join the mailing list for RDF DA WG. Here is how: To subscribe to www-rdf-rules <mailto:www-rdf-rules@w3.org>, send mail to |www-rdf-rules-request@w3.org <mailto:www-rdf-rules-request@w3.org>| with /Subject:/ |subscribe|. Use the /Subject:/ |unsubscribe| if you wish to remove yourself from this list. You will still be able to view these archives if you are not on the list. For more information, see the W3C mailing list page <http://www.w3.org/Mail/Request>. -- Regards, Farrukh
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]