Subject: Re: [regrep] ebXML Registry: Deviations from CCTS
Duane, The CCTS is good for modelling. We've already provided the RIM binding for that. For managing the implementation detail at the level of the XML instance you need CAM templates. There is already a provision in the <ContentReference> section of CAM so you can reference across to the CCTS model component and hence the RIM. Furthermore we are looking within the new Registry SCM work to define what the semantic content is in an XML instance in the Registry that will work for those ContentReferences. This will complete the stack here - from CCTS model through to particular syntax rendering. I do not see any reason to modify the CCTS specification at this point, nor the RIM binding. Thanks, DW.