OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [regrep] [Fwd: [regrep-semantic] IBM BI-ICS]

Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> David RR Webber wrote:
> >Joe,
> >
> >OK - despite Scott saying that BC-ICS is not IBMs answer to CAM,
> >the fact remains that if you have CAM, which we do, CAM is available
> >in open source - and an OASIS spec' - then there is absolutely no
> >earthly reason why you would want to do ICS instead.
> >
> >
> +1
> We should not even consider a spec until it is in an open standards body.

Farrukh, could you please elaborate on your meaning of "consider"? 

Separately: I do think that it's wise for technical committees (OASIS
and beyond) to be aware of what is out there, and - out of that set -
what is likely to be advanced into an open standards consortium in the
future, and how likely.


> Next we should not encourage specs that duplicate existing specs within
> open standards orgs.
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]