OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

regrep message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: RE: [regrep] XML2004 abstract deadline: May 7

I agree.  We have to be careful in what we call any presentation so that
we don't mislead folks.  If they expect one thing, based on the title,
and don't get it, we have broken trust, and they will view our titles
and presentations with suspicion in the future!  (well, maybe a bit
dramatic, but we do have to be aware of this).  I think Joe's suggested
title would be much more to the point, and clear in what it implies.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@bah.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 8:22 AM
To: Farrukh Najmi
Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [regrep] XML2004 abstract deadline: May 7

Sounds great - just wanted to point out that it will be a tough audience
with very high expectations in this regard ;)

Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> >Thanks Farrukh. Regarding the "Vocabulary Management" abstract:
> >
> >Given that the conference is here in DC, we can assume that there 
> >will be a good number of US federal attending. I fear that the fact 
> >that our architecture does not yet *natively* accomodate fine-grained

> >registration (per my e-mail to SCM SC yesterday) may portray ebXML 
> >Registry in a very negative light, as the federal folks have been 
> >asking for this for some time now. So if we do submit this abstract, 
> >I would recommend that we not call it "Vocabulary Management" - but 
> >perhaps "XML Schema Management" (or something more colorful perhaps).
> >
> >I know that there are differing mindsets on this - it's just that I 
> >am immersed in this environment here, and I would be remiss to not 
> >convey what I am constantly hearing.
> >
> >
> The paper would focus on Core Components, BIE registration, management

> and discovery topped with schema assembly using assembly decsriptors. 
> It would include assembly from
> fine grained core components and BIEs. Vocabulary Management seemed to
> be a good
> description but we will consider all suggestions for improvement.
> Duane, gave a very  compelling demo to the OASIS egov TC that showed 
> the assembler tool and the assembly process. We hope that this work 
> would be inlcuded in the UK egov
> pilot based upon ebXML Registry.
> See you soon.
> >See everyone in N'awlins!
> >
> >Joe
> >
> >Farrukh Najmi wrote:
> >
> >
> >>This deadline is May 7. Lets discuss abstract ideas on this thread.
> >>
> >>Here are some ideas we been considering recently in various forums:
> >>
> >>-Semantic Content Management Using ebXML Registry (present work of 
> >>the SCM SC, Carl Mattocks, Farrukh, ....) Carl, please confirm if 
> >>you can take ownership of this?
> >>
> >>-Vocabulary Management Using ebXML Registry (present the work of the

> >>UK egov pilot, Paul Spencer, Farrukh, Duane, ....) Duane, please 
> >>confirm if you can take ownership of this per our discussions at 
> >>Amsterdam?
> >>
> >>Any other ideas?
> >>
> >>Thanks.
> >>
> >>--
> >>Regards,
> >>Farrukh
> >>
> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the 
> >>roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_wo
> >>rkgroup.php.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> --
> Regards,
> Farrukh

Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]